• Services
  • Sectors
  • Our Team
  • About us
  • Insights & Legal
  • Legal Q&As
  • Useful information
  • Contact us
  • Careers
  • 13 Jun 2018

    Supreme Court gives important judgement in worker status case.

    The Supreme Court today has given its judgement in the case of Pimlico Plumbers Ltd v Smith.

    This is an important judgement in determining whether or not persons described as "independent contractors" are in fact in law "workers", thus enabling them to bring claims for holiday pay, unlawful deduction of wages and discrimination claims. 

    The Supreme Court has decided that the plumber in question, Mr Smith, was so much an integral part of Pimlico's operations and was subordinate to it, that he fell within the definition of a "worker". Although he could provide a substitute for his work, the substitute could only come from Pimlico's other list of plumbers. 

    Other important factors were that he:

    • Wore a Pimlico uniform.
    • Drove a Pimlico van.
    • Carried a Pimlico identification card.
    • Was bound by Pimlico's post termination covenants.

    Although it can be argued that the case is fact dependent, it sends out a clear warning to all businesses that although an individual may be described as an "independent contractor" they are in fact in law a "worker" and therefore have entitlement to a host of employment rights

    Contact our team today

    Contact Permission

    We would like to stay in touch with offers, news and event invitations. We will always treat your personal details with respect and we will never sell them to other companies for marketing purposes. You can find details of our full privacy policy here.

    You can stop receiving updates at any time by clicking 'unsubscribe' at the bottom of our emails or by emailing enquiries@hegarty.co.uk

    Please let us know if you would like to hear from us:

    Stay up-to-date with Hegarty